The thesis
The concept narrows, the residue is reassigned, the threshold acquires an owner
Every safety property that arrives from research as a virtue leaves standardisation as
a measurable quantity with a threshold, an owner, and an acceptability line held by
someone else. Each brief traces that same motion through one provision of the Act.
04
The Measurement Nobody OwnsArt. 15(2)–(3); Reg. 765/2008; ISO/IEC 4213; ISO/IEC 17025
Soon
05
Conformity by Reference to Documents That Do Not ExistArt. 40, 41, 43(1)(d); HAS assessment outcomes
Soon
06
Two Meanings of RobustnessArt. 15(1), 15(4); Recital 75
Soon
07
The Second RequestArt. 40(2), 53–55, Annex XI; C(2025) 3871
Soon
08
Representative of What?Art. 10(3) vs 10(2)(f)–(g)
Soon
09
Fairness Becomes an Acceptance CriterionArt. 10(2)(f)–(g); Art. 9(5); Art. 4a
Soon
10
Human Oversight Is a Latency BudgetArt. 14(1)–(4)
Soon
12
The System That Changes After the ExamArt. 3(23); Art. 43(1)(d), 43(4); Blue Guide 3-point test
Soon
13
The Provider Writes the ExamArt. 3(12), 3(13); Art. 6(3); Art. 25; Art. 80
Soon
14
Words That Look AlikeArt. 3(20)–(22), 40, 43, 47–48; ISO/IEC 17000, 17029
Soon
15
Compliance Is a Property of Your OrganisationArt. 17; Art. 43(2); Annex VI; Module A
Soon
16
No Safety Property Is Self-JustifyingArt. 8(1); Art. 9(5)(a)
Soon
17
The HandoffArt. 14(3)(b); Art. 9(5); Art. 26
Soon
18
The Same Input, Two RegulationsArt. 15(4) vs 15(5); Recitals 75, 76
Soon
19
The Act's Answer to the Black Box Is LoggingArt. 12; Art. 19; Art. 26(6); Art. 72
Soon
20
Transparency Is a DocumentArt. 13 vs Art. 86
Soon
21
What the CE Mark Actually PromisesArt. 40; Art. 47–48; Art. 82
Soon
The series is published in sequence. Briefs marked live link to their posts on the
Observatory's Substack; the rest are released in order and added to this
index as they appear.
